Wednesday 27 November 2013

Why are candidates not interested in your organisation?

One of the main challenges faced by organisations in the current employment environment is candidate attraction. To be able to improve this an understanding of the reasons why prospective candidates may not be interested is required. Once there is an understanding of the exact barriers that could prevent candidates being interested in an organisation then each one can be looked at individually. 

In the first half of this we aim to look at the most common barriers to interest faced by organisations globally. In the second part we will look at the possible opportunities to challenge and remove these barriers.



Core Barriers to Interest

From a sample of the projects we have completed during 2013 there were 10 main barriers to a prospective candidate being interested in any specific role or company. The Barrier to Interest data is made up of 2900 candidates from across a wide spectrum of levels, industries and locations. These candidates made up just over 21% of the total candidate population from the sample. Below is a list of these reasons in descending order:

1. 35% of all not interested potential candidates advised that happiness with their current employer/role was their main barrier to interest. Due to the international nature of the sample projects we are able to see that this value fluctuates dependant on country. The country which saw the highest proportion of candidates who stated that satisfaction with their current situation was Germany. This totalled nearly 60% of all the not interested candidates.

2. Location was the second most mentioned reason for not being interested with 18% of all people mentioning that this was the biggest barrier to interest in the role. This barrier is very much determined by the exact location of the role. When the role required international relocation this percentage was higher, though only by a small margin.

3. The third most common objection came when the candidates have recently started a new role. This compromised 10% of not interested candidates within our data set. As a total number of candidates this then becomes 2.1% of the total candidate population. This compares with the UK average where c.14% of the labour market* are within their first 6 months of employment.

4. With 7% the next most common reason given was the desire to work in a different industry to our client. This often came where we were asked to look for people with cross transferable skills, or where the client occupied a niche area of a wider industry.

5. No reason given took up 7% of the not interested candidates. These were the candidates that did not wish to speak and wouldn’t advise a reason as to why.  

6. 6% of the candidates in the data set weren't interested due to not being interested in the company we were working for. The vast majority of these were where the company we were working on were competitors of our candidates companies and the candidates wouldn't feel comfortable moving between them. There were a small number of isolated candidates that mentioned that they did not like the client company.

7. Role Specifics with 6% was the next most regular reason for candidates not being interested. This category covered a number of different reasons based around the exact details of the role in comparison with what the candidates were looking to do moving forward.

8. 5% of the candidates had stated that the Timing of the role would not be right. Most commonly this was down to events in the potential candidate’s personal life meaning that a change in role was not an option.

9. Level of Role was stated by 4% of the candidates as the key reason for not being interested. Upon having a deeper look into the information these candidates primarily were looking for a step up in role and could not see this opportunity being within our client companies.

10. Maternity was the 10th most common reason for candidates not being interested in discussing potential roles. This took up 2% of all our not interested candidates and comprised of 0.42% of the overall candidate population that we have spoken with over the last year. This is half of the UK average for women on maternity leave during a year (1.06% of the working population**).

Do you know the reasons why candidates turn down the opportunity to work for you? If not then perhaps it's time to start asking some questions to find out more. If you'd like some help with that then please feel free to ask.


Source: *Office for National Statistics Report: Job mobility and job tenure in the UK **The Telegraph http://bit.ly/1aVA9kl

Thursday 14 November 2013

Can You See Your Candidates?

Through my normal pre-work reading of various blogs (mentioned in previous posts!). I came across the infographic below on +Jim Stroud's blog. That post was focussed more on the legal side of social media. However for the sourcing community there were a number of interesting points.

How visible are your candidates?

Of these points the ones I found particularly interesting were the 1st and 2nd ones. 

The first is about the number of adult internet users who are on social media - roughly 70%. That leaves a massive 30% of potential target candidates unavailable through internet search. 

The second point is the more important for me, it's about the percentage use of different age groups:




If the roles you are working on are towards the junior end of the market - 18-29 then luckily for you 83% of the candidates will have an online profile meaning that only 17% are a little more tricky to get hold of.

If however you're working the more senior end of the market in terms of experience then you'll probably be looking towards the 50-64 category. Here you'll only find 52% of the candidates with online profiles. Clearly this leaves a huge proportion of the potential population unavailable. 

Of course these above numbers are absolute and don't correlate with the amount of profiles that are actually findable (within the short periods of time that we are given to complete a sourcing project). Along with this caveat is that within different sectors these numbers fluctuate wildly with some having little to no online presence and others having a very strong presence.

What is a Sourcer to do?

Once you realise the number of candidates that are unavailable through internet searching of any kind there is for us one main option. That main option is to get on the phone to look to understand the size and structure of the target teams and begin to map out the potential candidates that we are missing. I won't go into the methods in this post but if you want further reading I'd recommend looking up +Maureen Sharib and her many posts on the subject!

How would you go about finding the other half?





Wednesday 6 November 2013

What do you read? Part 1

Not really relevant but hilarious anyway!
I thought it would be good to share some of my favourite things to read and some of my favourite people to follow across social media (in no particular order). I've split this into two posts one based around sourcing specialists and the second part, to follow, based around the wider Recruitment & HR world.

Sourcing Specialists
This is who to follow if you want to stay ahead of the game when it comes to sourcing and searching.

Glen is a recruitment legend, his knowledge of internet sourcing is probably second to none and his blog posts are always a fascinating educational experience.

+Irina Shamaeva (Twitter: @braingain Web: booleanstrings.com)

Irina is in the same league as Glen when it comes to knowledge around sourcing, her website booleanstrings is one of the go to resources for all things search. She also runs a very interesting community who are always free to help out.


I had the pleasure of working with Martin during his time at Talent Works and he always had the time to help out with the many sourcing quests that we complete. If you ever have a question just drop him a line and he’s sure to be able to help or know of someone to help.

+Katharine Robinson (Twitter: @TheSourceress Web: uksourcers.co.uk)

Katharine is one of the UKs leading Sourcers (Sourceress’s?) and is always around to share great insights into sourcing techniques. She’s also a Sourcing Grand Master so is definitely worth following.

+Dan Russell (Twitter: @dmrussell Web: searchresearch1.blogspot.com)

Dan is a Google insider and his blog is an always fantastic place to hone your search skills. Some of his challenges have become legendary (the tower one in particular) and they’re a great place to really push your searching abilities.

+Maureen Sharib (Twitter: @MaureenSharib Web: http://magicmethod.ning.com/profiles/blog/list)

As much as the internet is fantastic. We sourcers cannot afford to forget telephone sourcing techniques. They can uncover a lot more information than the internet can offer. Maureen is, for me, the go to person for information around this.

+Jeremy Roberts (Twitter: @imJeremyR Web: http://jeremyrobertstx.com/)

Jeremy is the editor of SourceCon and has an extensive past in Talent Acquisition. Along with sharing all the great SourceCon knowledge Jeremy also hosts Google+ Hangouts where sourcers unite to right wrongs and help one another out.

+Jim Stroud (Twitter: @JimStroud Web: http://blog.jimstroud.com/)

Jim is the producer of some of my favourite videos related to sourcing they're always worth a watch and will always raise a smile along with provoking thought and relaying new ideas.

+Balazs Paroczay (Twitter: @TheBalazs Web: http://thebalazs.com)

Balazs leads one of the best sourcing functions around and his blog posts are always worth paying attention to - in particular see his deconstruction of Facebook searching, it really is fantastic work.
SourceCon should be one of the go to sources for anyone with an interest in recruitment, there's always a wide variety of content based around sourcing. They are of course the hosts of the SourceCon events and the infamous Grand Master Challenge (which really does live up to it's name).
So that is my list of who to follow, there are so many great people within the sourcing world on social media that this post could've been the best part of 20 pages long. Who else should I be following or reading? 
Of course you shouldn't forget to follow me! (Twitter: @LiamTFitzG LinkedIn: linkedin.com/in/liamfitzgerald)

Friday 1 November 2013

It's good to talk...

It's a slightly creepy picture but the advert's quote sums my most important point from this post... 

As a follow up to my previous post about spam I thought I'd add to the plethora of posts out there exploring how to best use social media. From the amount of people not 'getting' social media it appears an extra one won't go amiss. Here is a summary of some of the best advice I've been given:

Pick your goal: What would you like to do? Do you want to build your network with your peers or candidates/clients? From a personal view point it's important to be focussed on one or two areas as otherwise your content becomes diluted and irrelevant for your target audience.

Curate: The simplest way to build up a network is to curate interesting content relevant for your target audience. Here one of the RSS replacement apps (such as Feedly) is your friend. Then share it to your selected social networks.

Timing: Post your content throughout the day. There a multiple tools (such as: Buffer, Hootsuite & Do Share) that help with scheduling posts for all your social networks. It doesn't take much time to set-up a schedule to ensure your posts are spread out.

Share & Interact: Retweets and Likes (+1s) are all very good but conversations can be even better. Join in and reply to posts, blogs or tweets. To quote the above advert.. "It's good to talk".

Monitor: It's always a good idea to monitor what you're doing so you can improve the content that you are curating. Hootsuite and Buffer both have monitoring tools for the content that you put out and make it easy to see what has been successful and what hasn't. If you are particularly interested in your Twitter network then I like SocialBro, the free version gives some great insight and provides a "best time to tweet" function based on network activity.

Don't spam: It's pretty self explanatory but too often overlooked.
As a bonus: Create.. It takes a while to build up the confidence to put your work "out there" but why not give it a try (like I am). It's a frightening feeling at first but people are out there to encourage and support you (thanks +Tony Restell and +Aaron Lintz!).